Singapore is a nation celebrated for its efficiency and economic success, thanks in large part to the contributions of its foreign workforce. However, treatment faced by migrant workers in Singapore continue to reflect the lack of empathy and respect for them.
Neglecting the Well-being of Migrant Workers
The recent video shared by Transient Workers Count Too (TWC2) paints a grim picture of Coastal Dormitory. Located in a remote area, it has been aptly described as “in the middle of nowhere” with no nearby medical facilities. This remote location makes it difficult for residents to access basic amenities, including healthcare, and leaves them highly isolated.
Inadequate Transportation
One of the most concerning aspects of the dormitory’s conditions is the inadequate transportation provided to its residents. To access public transport, migrant workers are required to pay S$1 for a shuttle bus to the Tanah Merah Ferry Terminal, which is approximately 5km away. The 35- to 45-minute bus intervals are often insufficient, leading to long queues and wait times of up to two hours for a seat on the shuttle. This lack of efficient transportation severely limits the freedom of movement and access to the city for these workers.
Unreasonable Bus Fee
The introduction of the S$1 bus fee, implemented approximately three months ago, has placed an additional burden on already financially strained workers. While some may view it as a minor expense, it accumulates as an extra cost for those who have to travel to other parts of Singapore on a regular basis. The dormitory operator’s dismissal of this added expense as unproblematic demonstrates a lack of understanding of the economic challenges faced by many foreign workers.
Watch short film, Salary Day, a short film by Ramasamy Madhavan, that reflects the challenges and issues faced by a migrant worker in Singapore. Every single dollar adds up for them.
Operator’s Response
Coastal Dormitory’s response to the criticisms is disappointing at best. The operator attributes long queues to “greater demand” during peak times, suggesting that the inconvenience faced by the residents is comparable to Singaporeans commuting to work. This analogy is flawed as it fails to consider that residents have little control over their work schedules, and their isolation makes them reliant on the shuttle service.
The operator also claims that most residents have company-arranged vehicles, implying that the bus service is an extra benefit. However, this perspective neglects the workers’ right to basic transportation options that enable them to enjoy their limited free time in Singapore.
When asked about the amenities provided in the dormitories, the operator said that the dormitory is “spacious with full facilities” such as a gym and provision shops.
“These feedback are from some disgruntled resident who do not wish to stay there,” it added.
The revelations regarding Coastal Dormitory and its operator’s response are deeply troubling, entitled and lack empathy. Migrant workers are essential to Singapore’s continued growth and prosperity, and their welfare should be a top priority. The dormitory’s remote location, inadequate transportation, and the imposition of bus fees demonstrate a lack of empathy and understanding on the part of its operator.
In light of these issues, it is imperative that the relevant authorities step up to ensure the well-being and rights of all foreign workers in Singapore are protected. Neglecting their basic needs, especially in the context of a global pandemic, is not only morally reprehensible but also detrimental to Singapore’s reputation as a responsible and caring nation. It is time for the government and companies involved to reevaluate their treatment of migrant workers and prioritize their welfare.
